June 11, 2015 School Board Meeting

This blog begins the fifth year I have written a blog. It's also the 70th blog I have written. As you know I'm not the best writer or very good at grammar, but at least I try. I hope for those who take the time to read this find it worthwhile. I'm getting close to 10,000 page views, thank you for your support.

This meeting started with the recognition of Bart Cook. This was his last meeting after 17 years of board service, many of those as chairman. I didn't always agree with Bart on issues, especially when I first came onto the board, but I have a great deal of respect for him. His experience and problem solving skills will be missed, and so will his sense of humor. The next meeting Wade Christensen and I will begin our four year term of office. I will also start my 8th year on the board. Time sure flys by. Now I'm the second most senior member, behind Casey. 

Roger Harrison then gave us an update of the spring sports. Both track teams won their district competition. The girls ended up second at state, the boys took  seventh. The girls are sixth district softball champions, and the boys ended up third in the combined fifth and sixth district baseball. There were also many recognitions of individual accomplishments. It is truly amazing how well the Firth kids do in all sports. Thanks to all the hard working coaches. I know you don't get compensated very well for all the time you spend working with the athletes. I really appreciate your dedication to the kids. 

The resignation of Lisa Nelson and the hiring of Jotien Adams was mentioned. Jotien was in attendance, she comes from Blackfoot, and will teach 1st grade. She said she is excited to be here. There are still a couple positions that offers have been made but not finalized yet. Mr. Tubbs thinks they have next years staff in place. 

Julie Cederberg presented the proposed district budget for next year. The contingency fund is projected to be the same as last year, close to $800,000. The district will have an additional teacher compared to last year. Most of the increased budget amount will go to teacher and staff salaries. One income item that stood out was $85,000 from the lottery. A few years ago there was no line item for lottery income. I think the state increases or decreases the lottery money based on other state funding. Maybe this year they wanted to make the lottery look good so they credited far more money to it. 

The school lunch program will need to be subsidized about $15,000 from the general fund budget to support it. I asked about the reasons for this, and if there was any plan to try and balance the lunch program budget. This issue is very complicated. In my opinion the new nutrition standards championed by Mrs. Obama are the biggest problem. Less kids all the time are eating school lunches. Less participation really hurts the program. If the free and reduced participation falls too far the district will no longer qualify for free breakfast. Julie wasn't sure, but she thought we might have dropped below the participation minimum. Changing the lunch price is also not practical. The projection for next year is to receive $180,000 in meal re-embursments, for free and reduced student meals. Paid lunch funds are only projected to add up to $50,000, so you really can't raise the lunch price for the few that pay for it. The goal has been to have the lunch program as balanced as possible. I think the lunch ladies do a great job with the challenges of all the new requirements and paperwork they have to do. I have hope they will change the requirements, but more likely nothing will change for the better.

The budget for the new heating system in the elementary is $140,000, $70,000 funded through the levy. I asked if there was progress getting a company in to make recommendations on how we go forward with the heating system. When the idea came up at the last meeting that we just replace the old boiler with a new boiler for $140,000 and still have no air conditioning, we were all disappointed. Mr. Tubbs has talked further with some heating people from Idaho Falls. I think one concern replacing the old boiler with a new one is dealing with asbestos removing the old boiler. It was determined that if the roof heating and air conditioning will work out, that the boiler room can just be closed up and left alone. I asked questions about the student occupied and non occupied funds. These funds would need to be used to help pay for the new system. The non student occupied fund balance is around $830,000, the student occupied fund is much less. I think after expenditures are taken out the balance will be around $200,000. I'm not sure about this balance. It may be more. Some expenses  besides the boiler is $40,000 to complete the bus lane work, $10,000 for elementary playground maintenance, and the same for the middle school, and other repairs. The middle school will have the hall carpets removed and buffed like the high school. This budget is for $14,000. There is other money for carpets, painting and other repairs. When we find out our options for the elementary heating, we will need to decide if we can afford what we originally planned. 

Julie does a very good job managing our district funds. I sure don't anticipate the need to ask for another supplemental levy, unless maybe the state funding reverses course. The funding looks like it's going in the right direction, but I remember hearing if the revenue didn't keep improving something like 5% a year they won't be able to sustain their planned school budget increases. 

The teacher contract negotiations were discussed. All teachers, I think, will get a 3% raise. The district will also cover the increased insurance costs. It is good that the state is finally starting to increase teacher salaries. I hope this trend will continue. 

We then moved into executive session to discuss personnel. After our discussion we came out of executive session and voted to give Mr. Tubbs a one year pay  stipend of $2,000, to be reviewed for possible renewal. Mr. Tubbs a few years ago took a pay cut along with the staff. With all his responsibilities as both the Superintendent and elementary principal, we thought we should at least restore his wages closer to what he used to get. 

Well that is pretty much all for this meeting. It sure is easier to manage an increase in our budget revenue than decreases. I sure hope our funding can continue to improve. Thanks for your support. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know. Thanks, Brian

May 14, 2015 School Board Meeting

Sorry this is so late getting written. The first matter of business was talking about the resignation of Tamara Jolley as a first grade teacher and the retirement of Carol Barbre. Valerie Bame will teach 1st grade. She has been teaching in Burley. Becky Thane will be back again to teach secondary math, and Bob Lambert was hired to teach 9th and 10th grade English. There still is a need to hire teachers for the 1st and 5th grades. The district will also need to hire a special education teacher. I assume the new hires will be made soon. Thanks to all the teachers who left the district and welcome to those joining the district. 

We then had a discussion about replacing the elementary boiler. Administration has talked to several companies about how to go foreword. Many ideas were given. The estimated cost to replace the boiler is anywhere from $130,000 to $150,000, far more than the estimate that was done before the supplemental levy. The levy money will only cover $70,000 of the cost. Another problem is, even at this high estimate it doesn't include air conditioning. At this cost estimate we couldn't afford air conditioning. The air conditioning would add another $8,000 to $10,000 per unit, and this amount wouldn't include electrical upgrades that would be needed. As you might guess this was very disappointing to hear. I know the boiler is very old and needs replaced pretty soon, although it seems to still be working okay for now, one major goal in replacing it was to add air conditioning. After a long discussion and patron input, it was decided to go to an engineer who designs air systems for buildings like this and pay to have them give us their recommendations. This is a big investment and we need to have all the correct information we can get to be able to make the right decision.  Because of this delay in being able to proceed with bids, it's likely now that the heating system won't be replaced until next year. 

We then had a discussion about some concerns brought to the administration by the cheerleaders. Mr. Gee presented us a procedure recommendation for determining how many athletes can travel to state in each sport, and what costs the district pays for. Making sure only the students who qualify to participate in the state tournaments travel on the bus is part of the plan. By doing this it provides room for six cheerleaders to travel with them. The transportation recommendations also apply to district tournaments. When traveling to state basketball and football, the recommendation was to provide three rooms, two for cheerleaders and one to the advisor. 

Cheerleaders will not travel to regular season away games. There has been some concern about how to many cheerleaders should stand along the sidelines during basketball games. This past year there were 15 cheerleaders, next year there will be 21. The recommendation was for there to be 6 at one time. They can all perform during the normal breaks, but more than 6 on the floor at a time was thought to be a problem. All the cheerleaders can perform at their state competition. 

There was a lot of comments from cheerleaders and some parents. One question was if parents could take the cheerleaders to some away games so they can cheer at them. The cheerleaders would really like to cheer at some regular season away games. This is against policy for athletics and would apply to the cheerleaders too. All athletes have to travel by bus for safety reasons. If something were to happen to a student athlete traveling to away games in any other way than by bus the district could be held liable. This is the 

policy at other schools too. There were questions about taking an extra bus to some away games so students and cheerleaders could travel and cheer. Mr. Gee said it costs about $1,500 to take a bus almost anywhere. The district can't afford to provide an extra bus. There was talk about providing an activity bus and have students pay the cost. I guess this was tried once last year but not enough students signed up, so it didn't happen. There was also requests made to let more cheerleaders stand along the court than just six. I wondered if they need to have a limit to the number of cheerleaders. The way varsity cheerleaders are chosen was mentioned. There will be 17 of them, so that makes it harder to decide which six can travel to state. 

It seemed to me like we were being asked to make decisions that really should be left up to the coach, athletic director, and administration. I mentioned this and encouraged them to work this out, we as a board shouldn't micromanage this issue. I said the program has to stay within budget, beyond that everyone else needs to talk further to decide if anything needs changed from what was presented to us. I appreciate the cheerleaders and I'm glad their program is going well.  

Mr. Tubbs talked about the budget again, but he didn't have much new information. Next month we will have the budget meeting, so we should know a lot more then.

We talked over some policy updates and then went into executive session. I think that pretty well covers it. I thought the graduation went well. The graduating class was 67 students. My class, many years ago was 68. I for one am glad our district stays about the same. I'm sure glad I'm not on a board like District 93 and have all their growth issues. Hard to believe another school year is over. Good luck to all the graduating seniors. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks, Brian

March 12, 2015 School Board Meeting

It has been a while since I have written a blog. I missed last months meeting lobbying for the Idaho Dairy Association in Washington DC, and the month before there just wasn't much to write about. 

The first thing we discussed was the school calendar for next year. Next school year Memorial Day is later in the month, so it was easier to fit the days in before Memorial Day. After changing things around from the original proposal we seemed to be in agreement on the calendar. It wasn't on the agenda to be approved at the meeting this month, but I suggested we go ahead and approve it. We later voted to accept the calendar. School will start on Monday August 17th. Spud harvest will start September 28th. Christmas break will start on December 23rd. We decided to have an extra day before Easter, which will provide a four day weekend. Graduation and the last day of school will be May 26th. 

  Mr. Tubbs then went over an update of the Strategic Plan. He went over the balance sheets and told us overall the budget was on track. He talked about all the technology updates that have been done. The bus lane safety issue between the high school and seminary building has been addressed. Phase two of this project will be completed this summer. The sidewalk will be fixed and water brought into the island. There will be a hill built up and grass and trees will be planted. I asked if this was on track to get started early this summer and I was told it was. When finished this will look a lot better. 

The teacher leadership premium program is going along well. All certified teachers will have the opportunity to earn a bonus based on leadership incentives the district set up. 

There is only about half the adult classroom volunteers as last year, but there are more student, or what they call Cougar Volunteers. They really help in the elementary classrooms, mostly with reading.

Heating and cooling systems in all three buildings were discussed. The high school gym and several units in the middle school have had issues. There are something like 16 units in the middle school all original to the building. They are getting to the end of their life expectancy so having a plan to start replacing them will need to be developed. 

They have been gathering information about the elementary boiler and other heating and cooling options for the elementary. Several companies are estimating replacement costs and other repairs. This is supposed to be figured out by next school year. 

Computer labs don't look like they will cost as much as was once thought. The computer cost per unit has dropped from about $600 to $300. So this will greatly help reduce the planned computer lab costs.

There were other Strategic Plan issues brought up but I just went over the highlights. It's good they have been working on a plan to better manage what needs done in the district.  

The Internet issues that have been in the news recently were discussed. The district is with the same provider as before. We just pay monthly now and have a little less band width. The state is supposed to reimburse us for most of these costs. It's still up in the air as to what will happen for next school year. 

We went over several policy updates. One of these updates is about principal evaluations. 33% of their evaluation comes from student achievement. We need to decide what testing we will use to do their evaluation on. We will talk more about this policy in the future. I brought up my concern for this if it's  based  on SBAC, or the common core test. I think there will be some major problems with this test and how a principal evaluation can be fairly based on it. 

I did get a better explanation of how the state controls common core compliance. If we decided we wanted to opt out of the testing, we would lose all federal funds. Among other things we would lose probably 20 staff members. The state also requires 95% of the students to take the SBAC test. If we fall below that we can be declared an underperforming district and the state somehow would step in and run the district. If the SBAC participation is low we would lose some federal funds. I don't understand all the details of this, but they have a lot of control over districts. Madison is rebelling and plans on not complying with the SBAC. They will be a good test to see just how the state responds to them. At some point I think the students will be required to take the SBAC test to graduate. I don't know what will happen to the students who don't want to take this test. I sure hope this gets changed in the future. I have been hearing from my kids how hard the common core math is for my grandkids to learn, and they are still very young. At least one granddaughter used to love math, but now hates it, which isn't a good thing for an elementary student with much more math in her future.

We went into executive session to discuss the district teachers. I think that was about all that was discussed. 

I turned in my candidacy papers last week to run for re-election to the school board. If anybody wants to run against me, or for Bart's position you have until Friday to turn your papers in. Unless Bart changes his mind at the last minute he is going to retire from the board. I hope I have done a good enough job to win support for another term. Four years is a long commitment. It is different not having any children attending in the district. I have thought about having a cottage meeting sometime, mostly just to get better informed about what's going on. If anyone has comments or questions please let me know. 

Thanks, Brian

December 11th, 2014 School Board Meeting

Missing last months board meeting makes it seem like a long time since I wrote a blog. Before I get into this months meeting I have one matter of old business to mention. When we extended the spud harvest break the question came up about how much it would cost the district to potentially have twenty kids miss two days of school during our counting weeks. It took a while to find out the answer, but worse case scenario the answer given to me is $12,000. This amount is a lot more than I thought it would be. This number is variable depending on a lot of things, but it will be good to know this for future considerations when it looks like a lot of kids might be absent from school. This is why we don't hold school on fair day. Too many kids would be out and it would cost us a lot.

The meeting started out with the recognition of the fall sports. The volleyball team won district and was second at state. They also won the sportsmanship award. The girls cross country team finished fifth at state and the boys  ninth. The football team had a 5-4 record and made it to state, and the soccer team qualified for districts for the first time. Overall they all did very well. 

Carla Reeves resigned from coaching volleyball. She did very well, and will be missed. Two of the senior volleyball players did so well they received scholarships to play volleyball in college. Thanks for all your efforts Mrs. Reeves. 

Sherlyn Petersen resigned from teaching. Two half time teachers are teaching her classes until a new teacher can be hired, which should be pretty soon. 

Reports were then given about the state convention by Paul and Casey. They learned a lot and enjoyed the meeting. 

We then had a long discussion about potentially starting a boys soccer team. Since I missed last months meeting it took me awhile to get up to speed on what was discussed last month. Roger Harrison the AD, presented some information. He said there were twelve unpaid coaching positions. He went through the list. The middle school coaches and several assistant high school coaches are unpaid. The C team high school coaches aren't paid. Several of these positions used to be paid positions, but when we were forced to make big funding cuts this changed. Mr. Harrison also mentioned that ten of the girls soccer team are seniors. Because of this, there is a concern if there will be enough girls to field a team for next year. So far they only have about eleven girls interested in soccer for next year. This isn't enough and jeopardizes the continuation of girls soccer. If the girls program can't continue, it makes it harder to justify boys soccer. With both teams costs can be shared, like bussing. A student presented his ideas about a boys team. There were several interested boys to last months meeting, but just him this time. He says there are around sixteen boys interested in soccer. He had ideas about a coach. If we decide to start a boys team I think they would be required to sustain a program without costing very much to the school for two years, just like when we started the girls team. Questions I deal with, are there really enough boys to sustain all the fall sports teams? Would it be similar to the girls, once the initial support group of boys graduate, would there be enough other boys to follow? One of the reasons we started girls soccer was to improve title nine issues. Last year we had 159 boys in all sports combined. The girls with soccer only had 108. If we loose girls soccer and start boys soccer, this really gets out of balance. We talked about this issue at the board meeting. Other concerns I have is all the coaches unpaid now, that I already mentioned. The cost estimate was $3,000 to fund boys soccer, once the district would potentially start paying for it. I don't  think this number includes the coaching stipend. Would it be better to work on restoring coaching stipends first? What about other school programs that are underfunded, some of which are core classes. I hear about things like the science department having fundraisers to buy needed supplies, for example. There were concerns about how the boys could raise the money to self fund. The boys need to show they have enough parent support with fundraisers in mind to better show we should consider this. There are other options for some of these boys to play soccer through clubs or maybe joining other schools teams, like a couple girls did before we started their program. We will need to decide if we should go forward with a boys program by next month, to get game scheduling worked out in time. 

During public comment a concern was brought up about how many games the cheerleaders can cheer at. Mr. Tubbs addressed their concern. They only cheer at home games, some district games, and state playoff games. This has been the policy for a long time. Because of many factors this is unlikely to change, at least very much. 

Because of girls basketball conflicts, next months board meeting was changes to January 14th. 

Other than going over policies this was pretty much all that was talked about. As always if you have questions or concerns let me know. If you have thoughts about soccer let me know. This is one of those issues that no matter what we do not all will be happy. Thanks, Brian

October 9th, 2014 School Board Meeting

Sorry I didn't write a blog last month. I was very busy and there wasn't much business to talk about. A couple things from last month. Bart Cook was presented a lifetime Idaho High School Activities Association pass. After 12 years of board service a board member qualifies for this pass. Bart has served 17 years, so they are a little slow presenting this to him. Thank you Bart for all your years of service to our district. 

Mr. Kunz asked to get permission to send out a bid for a new bus. The old one being retired is 17 years old and has 160,000 miles. It will be auctioned when we get the new bus next summer. 

The new bus lane was discussed. The curb and gutter has been put in. There is still some landscaping to do, but it sure looks better. Next year the plan is to lower the roadway between the high school and berm. Repave the roadway, and repair and replace the sidewalk, and put a curb in on the other side. Hopefully the next phase can start early next year. 

Well onto this months meeting. 

The first thing was the annual audit report by Morgan Hatt. The annual budget year ended June 30. Our total district revenue from all sources was $4,997,645. $4,027,443 from the state, $514,884 federal, $314,753 property taxes, and $120,565 other local revenue. I can't remember what other revenues are. The total revenue amount was $7000 more than last year. Total expenditures were $4,900,765, for a net revenue gain of $76,880. 

We had 754 enrolled last year and spent $6,500 per student. State average was $6,659. Mr. Hatt thought for a district of our size we did very well. He said smaller schools usually spend more per student. For example he said Rockland spends about $11,000 per student. Large schools much less. 

Our fund balance increased $53,382. This was the first increase in many years. Our total contingency fund balance ended up at $836,144. Mr Hatt also indicated this was very good compared to other school districts. With our revenue down $564,000 this past year compared to 2010, the chart only went back this far, it is remarkable that we still have a good balance in our contingency. Thanks to all our staff who manage the budget. Now with the support of the community in voting for our supplemental levy, we will be able to do some much needed updates, and still maintain a responsible amount in our contingency. 

We had 41.57 units of students. Our M&O budget per unit was raised just under $300 per unit from the year before. I asked if our attendance had improved this past year with the efforts mostly through the Education Foundation to reward perfect attendance. He said we went up from 96% in 2013 to 98% last year. I'm not sure how much this helped our funding, but better attendance does help. We received $13,419 in facility maintenance money from the state. This is the first time in many years we received  money for this use. There was also $15,173 from the state lottery. We were told the past few years the lottery money was just put into the overall state education fund, so we didn't know just how much we received. For whatever reason this year they separated it again. We have $821,871 in our non student occupied fund, which is where the money comes from for the bus lane project. We have $203,343 in our student occupied fund, which we used a couple years ago to buy the high school bleachers. 

Last year we had a $28,060 budget surplus in our school lunch budget. This year thanks to the new federal nutrition standards we ended up with a $9,793 deficit. The added cost of the required food really adds up. We were told we are losing about .30 for every meal we serve. The government reimburses us $2.95 for free and reduced lunches which has helped fund the difference between what meals cost and what we charge, but with the higher food costs and less participation we are going in the hole. In 2009 our free meal participation was 68%, now it's 61%. Only 50% of the kids that qualify for reduced price lunches are eating it. Overall this past year only 53% of our district students ate school lunch. The lunch service personnel spend a lot of time doing required paperwork, they didn't used to have to do. It will be interesting to see if the standards will get changed much going forward. The waste and how unbending the new standards are is sure messed up.

The district was given thirty five computers and some chairs from the FBI office out of Pocatello. Lisa Trent was instrumental in acquiring this equipment for our district. So thanks to her for her efforts. They will be distributed to several rooms in the district. Trying to put them all together drew to much amperage and the elementary breakers couldn't handle it. Next year we will get some new computers which will use less power and should work okay in the planed elementary computer lab.

The high school participated in a detailed survey to determine how many kids worked during spud harvest, and what they did. Out of about 250 kids 217 filled out the survey. 51 kids worked in the potato harvest. 116 other kids worked during harvest, doing many different things. There may have been a few more kids still working Wednesday when this survey was done. There were 4 kids who worked 13 days, 4 who worked 14 days and 1 worked 16 days, all the rest worked less days. I was surprised to see how many kids that worked during the harvest doing other things. Some spent a lot of time babysitting which could have been related to harvest. They did a simple survey in the middle school. 23 middle school students worked in the potato harvest. We have a lot of ambitious kids in our district. 

I asked during public comment how many students we have enrolled this year. Mr. Tubbs didn't have this information, but would soon update the board. Another suggestion was for us to put up a sign by the main road to indicate where the football field is. We thought this would be a good idea. Just a thought, maybe this could be a good eagle project for someone. 

This meeting had as poor attendance as you could have at a meeting. Three board members, Mr. Tubbs, the board secretary and business manager, and two reporters. Bart came after we adjourned for an executive session, he was still helping in the potato harvest.  Well this ended up very long, but I hope I provided valuable information. The board is going to walk through the buildings and receive training from ISBA on October 22. If you have questions or comments let me know. Thanks, Brian.

Letter to Editor, Thoughts About Leadership Premiums

After reading about the teacher Leadership Premium program presentation in the Blackfoot school district, I felt a need to comment. As a Firth school board member, we reviewed this program a couple months ago. We decided on a much different plan. We as a board, supported a plan that would provide the potential for all teachers to receive an equal share of these funds, as long as they meet the qualifications and requirements presented by our administration.   As I understand it, the state gives $850 per unit or teacher for this plan. The only way a teacher can make more than $850 is if other teachers receive none of this money. So essentially the districts are left with the decision of who can qualify for the funds and who can't, and that didn't seem fair. With teacher pay so flat in recent years, it didn't seem right to develop a plan that would benefit one teacher over another, or offer no potential for some teachers to receive this bonus. It would be harder to have teachers in positions where they couldn't qualify for these funds. I believe almost all teachers are doing their best to educate their students, so deserve to be rewarded for their efforts.

Why does the state Department of Education , with the support of the Legislature, feel compelled to keep coming up with these potentially divisive programs? If they were so good, why do they change the name and criteria every year? I am all for paying our teachers more money, but I believe it would be better to raise the overall pay scale instead of funding merit programs. My son gave up teaching recently. He taught for six years with only a token amount more pay in the final year of his employment than when he started. He couldn't support his family the way he wanted, and chose to further his education and enter a different profession.

I worry that unless Idaho chooses to step up and improve teacher pay, we won't entice college students into the teaching profession, and will continue to lose some of our best teachers to other states where they pay a higher wage.

August 14th, 2014 School Board Meeting

I am late again this month writing my blog. There has been a lot going on. This was however another month with a short agenda, and very few in attendance. 

The meeting started with the resignation of Stewart Portela as the track coach, and the hiring of Jason Chatterton as a Maintenance Man. 

We were then given an update of the summer maintenance projects. There has been a lot of painting in all the schools. Paint can make things look a lot better. There also has been a lot of work putting in new computer and phone wiring. Barb has really helped getting our technology improvements in place. All the gym floors were resurfaced. Rockymountain Power is doing a review to see if we qualify for new lighting in the middle school. It sure would be nice to get better lighting, like the other buildings. One of the main things completed is the removal of the carpet in the high school hallway and the polishing of the cement. It looks much different, but will be much easier to maintain. Having polished cement floors in school hallways is very common now. The cold weather entry at the elementary is on hold, not sure when it will get done. The parking and bus lane improvements between the high school and seminary building are progressing, just not as fast I would like. Hopefully the major work can get done during spud harvest. 

We talked over having board training and if anyone wants to go to the school board convention in Boise. The legislature last session included more funding for board training. We decided to start with strategic planning and have a trainer come to us. I can't attend the convention and I'm not sure if anyone else will go. 

We were given a copy of each schools handbooks and talked about the Superintendent evaluation schedule.

We then had a lengthy discussion about possibly moving back spud harvest one week. A local farmer requested we do this. He depends on help from high school kids and his spuds won't be ready to harvest in time for our first week break. He said there were eight spud farmers in the district, something I didn't know. I think all the farmers had been contacted and  some take longer than the two weeks, some only one week, but the scheduled harvest break didn't appear to be a problem for anyone else.  I hope he can work out his schedule, but to me it wasn't a good idea to change the break just for him. It was estimated about thirty kids work in the harvest. I was concerned about family vacations that may be planned for the same time. Yes we need to accommodate farmers, but changing our traditional harvest break especially after the calendar is set, would likely cause more problems than it would solve. I for one have taken my family on vacations to Disneyland during the harvest break in years past. It's a good time to go to places like this because of cooler weather and less people, and many vacations are planned a long time into the future. I later heard from someone that has a family vacation planned for harvest break and is glad we didn't change it.  I stated at this point the only reason I think we would change harvest break is if we get a lot of rain so the harvest is held up. 

This is pretty much all that was talked about. I hope this wet weather soon changes so our harvest season can get back on track. As always if you have questions or concerns let me know. Thanks, Brian