Tuesday, May 24, 2016

May 12, 2016 School Board Meeting



I missed writing a blog last month. There wasn't a lot of business and I have been gone a lot. There wasn't a lot of business at this meeting either, but I wanted to express my thoughts on some things. I will get to it a bit later. 

The first thing I want to do is thank everyone that supported our Supplemental Levy. The levy money will really help with our technology needs. We soon will be the only district in the county with a one to one device for each student. I really hope the time will come where we won't need to ask for any more Supplemental Levies. At least we were able to lower the amount substantially.

The first matter of business was the resignation of Carla Reeves. She will be teaching next year in Shelley. I know she will be missed. I wish her the best in her new position in Shelley. We also approved the hiring of five new teachers. Patrice Williams 2nd grade, Sarah Bates 4th grade, Elizabeth Grosbeck 5th grade, Tracy Messick MS English, and Nicole Hopkins Special Education. Darren Jolley will also move to MS Social Studies. These teachers all have local ties. I'm glad the district was able to hire such a good group of teachers. 

We then had a long discussion about the possibility of bringing back humanities courses. Mr. Tubbs has heard that the state is going to change the current highly qualified certification teacher requirements. We used to have drama for example, but when they changed the requirements, drama had to be dropped because the teacher wasn't highly qualified. Hopefully this will change so more electives could be offered. I don't know how soon we will know if, or how this will change. 

There is a strong desire by some to start a band and choir program. A few years ago this was tried, but in the end it didn't work out very well and when the funding was cut from the state, the music program was dropped. There were some patrons in attendance who spoke in favor of starting a music program. Other board members said they have heard from several patrons who would like the district to offer band again. Nobody in my zone has indicated any desire to start band, at least not to me. I wish there was a way to find out how many kids would sign up and stay in band. If band was started the district would probably require a humanities credit, which would be just one semester, for graduation. Several years ago when there was a successful band program our class sizes were larger, and there were less requirements for graduation. With smaller classes, band students would need to stay in band throughout high school. As you can tell I'm not convinced a band program would be successful now. But my biggest concern is how to fund a full time music teacher and maintain the funding indefinitely. In the past the funding came from a certified teaching position. All our teaching positions are currently filled. One thing that was done before is having one less teacher in a grade that had less students. I don't think it was very easy to move teachers around so much to accommodate the changing class sizes. We do have one class of about 47 students. If we had an open teacher position, which we don't, would it be okay to only have two teachers in this grade, so there would be more students in each of the two classes? If a position opened up, I'm not sure if this would be a good option.

Another idea suggested by other board members was to use some of our Contingency Fund. We currently have over $800,000 in this account. This money is set aside as a savings account. Our accountant has recommended we maintain a minimum of at least two months of our operating budget. As long as I've been on the board our contingency has been pretty close to this amount. I asked the business manager how long it took to build the fund up to this level. She said when she started, I can't remember for sure how long ago she said, but around 30 years ago, the Contingency Fund was around $700,000. So this fund may go up and down a little over time, but stays close to the same. I made it very clear during this meeting that I will not support funding a music teacher out of our Contingency Fund. I was definitely in the minority over not wanting to use this fund. Next month will be our budget meeting, where all our projected funding and expenses will be presented to us. They also estimate where our Contingency fund will end up. There is no guarantee that our funding will continue to improve or even drop in the future. Mr. Tubbs was asked to discuss with the management team how we might go forward with a music program. Our district has done a very good job operating with a conservative budget. I think it would be irresponsible to start a band program without a secure plan to fund it.

Mr. Tubbs talked about the district funding. But as I said they will present the budget for our approval next month. He also talked about the Leadership Premium Plan. This year every certified teacher earned the premium. The state doesn't like how we allow every teacher the opportunity to earn the same premium. They changed it for next year. They raised the minimum amount from $850 to $900, but the catch is the state won't fund the extra $50. So if we want to maintain our program the same, we will have to come up with the extra $50 for each premium earned. We are going to continue the program the same as in the past. Some teachers were asked to be there to tell us how they earned their premium. They truly work for the little extra money, and I sure wouldn't want to purposely exclude anyone. 

Well that is all that was discussed. If you want to, let me know what you think about the challenges of starting a music program. It's not a simple decision. I played in the band from the fifth grade through the first part of my senior year.  I enjoyed my time in band until my senior year. We had a new teacher that was terrible and the program struggled. She would literally degrade and swear at anyone over the littlest things. I refused to listen to her do things like that, so I quit. I do think it's hard to find the right person to teach band, which is another concern. 

Thank you. I welcome your comments, or input. Brian 

11 comments:

  1. I strongly feel that everything possible should be done to get the music program going again! Students used to eagerly sign up because they had been watching their older siblings or cousins play in the band or sing in the choir's, it will be a little more difficult now because they haven't had that example for them. Playing a musical instrument or singing in the choir is something that can benefit you your whole life weather you're 9 or 90, as I've seen in the community orchestra. Your children and grandchildren deserve this amazing opportunity!
    Thanks,
    Melanie Likes

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm 100% with Melanie on this! The knowledge and skills learned with music are a refinement that enriches throughout your lifetime! I've been sad my younger children weren't offered that opportunity in school. What can we do to support the institution of a music program in our school again?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm 100% with Melanie on this! The knowledge and skills learned with music are a refinement that enriches throughout your lifetime! I've been sad my younger children weren't offered that opportunity in school. What can we do to support the institution of a music program in our school again?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm with the above. We need to start offering more for our students. We have built strong, solid athletics in our school but what are we doing for those not interested in sports? I have no problem hiring a teacher from the fund. That's what it is there for, to help improve education. I also gave no problem making some sort of music whether it be band of choir a one semester requirement. Not all students will appreciate this but not all students have loved having to take PE either. It's good for them to expand their horizons and sometimes do things they don't want to do. I think the key will be your teacher! We have not find well in the past with finding a teacher that makes the kids want to learn music. Take the time to find someone that the majority will like. That was the biggest issue last go around was the teacher. I am in full support of getting music back. I gave also heard that the music program can help increase the learning levels if the students. I gave to say that I was actually disappointed in the boards decision to lower the levy. Our school is hurting and that extra $100,000 could have done great things for our district. We were use to paying it and now if you ever need to raise the amount, good luck. I am not opposed to using the levy for teachers, in fact I would rather pay a teachers salary then pay for laptops. You can't replace good teachers with computers. I know we needed the chrome books but we also need more teachers and variety of what our students can take. How did this school go from offering so much to having so little? I think that the school board members need to reach out a little more to their zones and find out what their people want. Not everyone can make the Board meetings to voice their opinions. I think the board might be surprised at how many people would support a levy to hire new teachers if they knew that those teachers were going to add some new electives to our district. I as a parent am not opposed to increasing my taxes by such a small amount if it provides my children with more opportunities. If I had to pay a private music teacher, the cost would be substantially more than what I would pay in a levy to give my child that opportunity

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for all the comments. It's good to know someone is reading my blog.

    I'm not against starting a music program again, but I have at least two major concerns. If there is truly enough interest to start and maintain a viable program, and how to fund the teacher. I've heard where larger districts are struggling to keep their bank programs going. Band participation numbers are down substantially.
    I brought up at the end of our board meeting, that it was to bad we didn't have this discussion before we settled on our levy request. The Stratigic Committee focused entirely on technology. To get where we wanted to be with our technology we came up with what we asked for. Without using a teaching position, or through some other budgeted means, I will not support using our contingency funds, or savings account. There has been no real increase in this account for at least twenty five years. Tapping into a stagnate account for $50,000 or whatever it would cost each year, is something I just will not support. At the time of our first levy request we asked for funding to keep from losing so many teachers. The levy failed. I wouldn't feel good about the idea that we could maintain the music teacher through a supplemental levy.
    Hopefully the management team will come up with a workable plan that I can support. But as I said before, I don't think there is funding without using a teaching position, and can we accept the problems of having one less teacher would bring about.
    Thanks, Brian

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think that as times and funding are changing, the board needs to find out from the community whether or not they would support a levy to help pay for teachers. What didn't pass years ago should not keep our district from moving forward. Asking questions doesn't hurt anyone but assuming a population would do a negative vote because of the past is not going to help our district move forward. Ask the public their opinions, but put real numbers to it. If I know that a levy that would support two new teachers that would provide two new subjects would only cost me a few dollars more a month in taxes, I would totally support it! Didn't we add thirty thousand dollars to the contingency fund last year? If we have that kind of money to add to a savings account, why aren't we putting that towards new teachers and programs? What is the exact amount that the state suggests that we have? I have a problem with having a failing district and bring told we don't have money to use on education because we have this money sitting there "just in case". What are the just in cases we would use that for? How far down the toilet do we have to go before we start worrying about the kids rather then just the funding? I am all for a back up plan but what good are these accounts if they just sit there? This district needs an overhaul and we need to be willing to break out of the comfort zone a little to ensure our community is getting the education they deserve.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We will know more about our budget as it is now at our next board meeting. We will be presented the budget for next school year. We know some costs, like insurance are going up. I don't know how much the negotiated new teacher contracts will affect our budget, but costs will go up. I proposed using some of our contingency to buy some of our technology needs, as a one time expense. I was told without a levy we wouldn't be able to afford our second IT position, and it was critical we maintain this position. We put money into our contingency last year, but overall for several years the money has remained about the same. It has also been told to us that just because this past legislature increased our funding, doesn't mean the next legislature won't decrease it.

      Delete
    2. If the highly qualified teaching requirements get changes like Mr. Tubbs think they will, there would be an opportunity to add back in some electives. Potentially drama and art and others.

      Delete